What the actual fuck is this by Riot? They couldn't get away with this garbage last time so they thought they'd just wait it out and try again?
> Wilkes also alleges that after Leonard signed with the Clippers he met with West at a Beverly Hills restaurant and West "reconfirmed that he and the CLIPPERS would take care of him and honor their agreement. Jerry then instructed Plaintiff to type his request for payment and email it to his good friend Jim Gray. While at the meeting Jim Gray sent Plaintiff his email address. Plaintiff formalized his request in writing and emailed it to Jim Gray shortly thereafter," according to the lawsuit.
If true, all Wilkes has to provide are the email communications with Jim Gray. That should be the smoking gun.
I did some of my own DD, and the Max Sound v Google lawsuit appears to be smoke in mirrors. The first direct case between Google and Max Sound was already closed, and MAXD is no longer a plaintiff in the second case with Attia as the main plaintiff; they were dropped in 2019. Proof is below
If you search for Max Sound on the Santa Clara County public court case portal, you get 2 cases. One is Max Sound. v. Google and others, and another is Attia and others vs. Google. Screenshot: https://ibb.co/qBDGyP6
The Max Sound v. Google case appears to have been dismissed in 2014. The other Attia case originally had Max Sound listed as a Plaintiff, but Max Sound was dropped as a Plaintiff in July 2019. Yes, they are still listed as a plaintiff on the Santa Clara website, but this is a clerical issue; there's no way to denote a former plaintiff. Attia is an architect and the subject of the case seems largely unrelated to MAXD. Look up the case yourself, or look at the footnote here noting that Max Sound was dropped as a plaintiff: https://ibb.co/V9KkGjp
It seems like there are shills and/or uninformed people on Reddit disputing the claim that the case was closed, but they'll point to the Attia case, on which MAXD was listed as a Plaintiff. That is invalid because MAXD was dropped as a plaintiff on that case in 2019.
Since the value of MAXD appears to be entirely based on the Google lawsuit and the Google lawsuit appears to no longer at all involve MAXD, this is a pure pump and dump. Maybe you can still make money, but the underlying value proposition appears to be totally invalid.
Look at this guy's comments to see how to verify all of this for yourself: https://stocktwits.com/stonkt
Edit: it appears as though MAXD has power of attorney for Attia in this case and will receive 50% of the payout after fees. I find it odd that this centers around IP related to architecture when Max Sound works in the audio space, but whatever. I won’t be investing in this one, but I wish luck and big gains to the people who choose to go in.
Looks like there will be additional plaintiffs added to the Pompeop v Milligan case! Deadline to apply is February 15
Girlfriend got into an accident 2.5 years ago. She was hit from behind, which pushed her car into the back of the plaintiff’s car. The car that hit my gf fled from the scene. This is documented in a police report in my gf’s possession, speed estimate around 20 mph. My gf’s father said he had her insurance “under control,” but he was pocketing the money my gf was giving him for the insurance so my gf was actually uninsured at the time of the accident. DMV suspended her license, made her get SR-22 insurance, and she paid the entire repair bill for the plaintiff out-of-pocket. She was compliant with all of this and eventually paid all of the $3k+ repairs out-of-pocket as well as SR insurance.
Plaintiff, 2 mo after being hit, then demanded my gf pay her another $3,000 for suffering and lost wages. She did not provide a copy of her medical note or procedures done, nor any proof she lost wages. Gf couldn’t pay out-of-pocket for this, so the plaintiff initiated a lawsuit. After the plaintiff rescheduled the trial date 3x, the final court date was 10 days prior to the 2 year anniversary of the accident. She promised to “make sure (my gf) would never drive again” through text. Again, the plaintiff did not show up to court, and the magistrate ruled in favor of my gf, dismissing the case.
6 days after the 2 year anniversary of the accident, she filed ANOTHER lawsuit for $85. Plaintiff refuses to communicate with my gf and we frankly don’t know where she got this $85 figure. The trial date for THIS suit was today, but the plaintiff rescheduled the date again for two months from now.
Is there any grounds here to countersue for abuse of procedure or something similar? Or even a restraining order - these court dates are getting ridiculous and costing a lot of gas money back and forth. The plaintiff will not communicate and seems to just be stringing this along for as long as she can. Also, is it true she can’t sue for personal injury claims now, given that the accident was over two years prior to the day she filed her new suit? Statute of limitations for these cases in Ohio seems to be 2 years.
As we're all aware, DFV is getting a bullshit class action against him. I read the Bloomberg/Yahoo article and it mentioned the Christian Iovin (Lead Plaintiff) having sold calls and subsequently rebuying them when the price went up. If this is truly the case, than the actions the plaintiff took are in direct opposition to the anything discussed on WSB and by DFV. Here is a link to the Yahoo article because the Bloomberg one is behind a paywall:
To join the Robinhood class action, go http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-2029.html
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of those who sold American Airlines Group Inc. (NASDAQ: AAL), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. (NYSE: AMC), BlackBerry Limited (NYSE: BB), Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (NASDAQ: BBBY), or GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME) via the Robinhood trading platform on or after January 28, 2021 as a result of Robinhood's restrictions.
Posting on behalf of my husband who is not a redditor.
He switched from defense to a plaintiff practice, and made partner (same firm movement- small mid tier NY firm). His comp structure is base plus bonus which is consistent with how he was paid in defense (bonus largely driven by hours billed with a variable subjective overlay).
His practice group is considering spinning out on their own. We are trying to understand how partners in a plaintiff practice get paid- do partners get percentage of settlements? He has a chance to renegotiate his comp and he would like to understand this better. Any advice would be appreciated. It’s IP law and they have a solid set of clients.
“Please set out and state where you were located from 8 AM February 25 2014 through 8 AM February 28th 2014.”
Day of gun day through the day after of Christian’s murder. Will they submit an answer to the question?
Check out @GoodTidings message on StockTwits http://stocktwits.com/GoodTidings/message/289212756
One of the good folks of different message board shared this. I think this shows how incredibly serious Hong is to Take Google to justice.
I know we don't have much PR to go by yet but actions speak strongly folks!
as someone whom is adopted, i am disgusted by him scoffing at responding to JJ question with giving his 4th child away for adoption. and he serves our country? 🤢 where tf is his integrity, example, loyalty? less worth than the dirt under my shoe
Not sure how active this community is but i'm curious.
Possibly around 2010, maybe before that, maybe after.
A rather odd guy as plaintiff. I remember googling him at the time - his surname was something like Antronick, Antonack, Artonat; but I've just googled and can't find any reference using those so obviously I've got that slightly wrong.
He was a man probably early 40s in age but looked much older. Dressed kind of old fashioned in a shabby suit and tie. Had dark hair and I think a side parting. He was trying to recover 'loans' from women he'd met online who had rinsed him, IIRC. Judy kind of went to town on him; what did these women see in him because she couldn't understand it and so on. He was SO cheesed off when she said that.
I recall when I googled him originally that I found he was something of a vexatious litigant. There were several references to other court cases. He may have been something of an amateur lawyer.
State how many times you went to Christian Andreacchio's between Feb 20, 2014 and March 1, 2014 and describe what you did there each time.
I, /u/screwball2, created a photoshopped image on 08/03/20 and posted it to /r/The_Mueller, /r/MarchAgainstTrump and /r/EnoughTrumpSpam.
On 11/13/20, /u/Ohnoh18 posted my image to /r/pics and, in less than 24 hours, acquired over 57K Karma and over 43 Awards without crediting /u/screwball2, the content creator.
Exhibit 1 - The offending post to r/pics
Exhibit 2 - My post to /r/MarchAgainstTrump
Exhibit 3 - My post to /r/EnoughTrumpSpam
Exhibit 4 - My post to /r/The_Mueller
The Judge in this case will be the Honorable /u/AlfonzoLinguini
The Prosecutor will be /u/informalmoney1 the fearless
The Plaintiff is /u/screwball2
The Defense will be argued by /u/GFTRGC
The Accused is /u/ohnoh18
Members of the Jury will include:
/u/ThisIsanAlt0117 as forman
/u/Waste-of-Bagels whom, I am advised, will also provide the requisite loudly snacking on day old bagels function.
/u/jtfff will also be seated, though his contribution may be limited to sleep, perchance to dream, until the final verdict.
Pitchfork Sales & Distribution Agent will be /u/ThisIsanAlt0117 in the likely event that pitchforks are required.
Message me if so
>Wilkes also alleges that after Leonard signed with the Clippers he met with West at a Beverly Hills restaurant and West "reconfirmed that he and the CLIPPERS would take care of him and honor their agreement. Jerry then instructed Plaintiff to type his request for payment and email it to his good friend Jim Gray. While at the meeting Jim Gray sent Plaintiff his email address. Plaintiff formalized his request in writing and emailed it to Jim Gray shortly thereafter," according to the lawsuit.